January 2017
Volume 6, Issue 1
Open Access
Erratum  |   February 2017
Erratum
Translational Vision Science & Technology February 2017, Vol.6, 10. doi:10.1167/tvst.6.1.10
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Erratum. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2017;6(1):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.1.10.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Erratum in: “Significant Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression in the First Two Years: What Does It Mean?” by Andrew J. Anderson (Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2016;5(6):1) doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.1 
There was a systematic calculation error for all positive predictive values (PPV) presented in the paper. The upper panels for Figures 2 through 5 reporting PPV, along with numerical PPVs in the text, have been corrected in the article online. The previous discussion and conclusion regarding the utility of a slope-based criterion was therefore incorrect, and has now been altered online to state that such a criterion produces a small improvement in PPV. The general conclusion that the presence of a statistically significant regression slope is not highly predictive of truly rapid visual field progression is unaltered. 
A document showing the changes is available as Supplementary Material. 
Citation: Anderson A. Erratum in: Significant glaucomatous visual field progression in the first two years: What does it mean? Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2017;6(1):10, doi: 10.1167/tvst.6.1.10
Supplement 1
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×