%0 Journal Article
%A Anderson, Andrew J.
%T Significant Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression in the First Two Years: What Does It Mean?
%B Translational Vision Science & Technology
%D 2016
%R 10.1167/tvst.5.6.1
%J Translational Vision Science & Technology
%V 5
%N 6
%P 1-1
%@ 2164-2591
%X It has been recommended that multiple visual field examinations be performed in the first 2 years after glaucoma diagnosis so that rapid visual field progression (≤−2 dB/year, using ordinary least squares regression over time of the summary index mean deviation [MD]) can be detected. Here I investigate how predictive a statistically significant regression slope is of truly rapid visual field progression. I simulated visual field series (N = 100,000) spaced at 4 monthly intervals for the first 2 years. MD values had a standard deviation of 1 dB. The true underlying rates of progression were selected from a modified hyperbolic secant with parameters averaged from fits to large data sets from Canada, Sweden, and the United States. The positive predictive value (PPV) for rapid progression was 0.10 after 2 years, whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was > 0.99. When using the criterion that a significant regression also had to have a slope of ≤ −2 dB/year, the PPV for rapid progression increased to 0.18 but the NPV was essentially unchanged (NPV >0.99). Although performing multiple visual fields in the first 2 years provides appropriate power to detect rapid progression, a significant regression slope in the first 2 years is not highly predictive of rapid progression, particularly so if slopes ≤ −2 dB/year are considered only. Statistically significant visual field progression in a short period after diagnosis may not necessarily indicate the presence of rapid progression, and so confirmatory signs of rapid progression should be sought before implementing treatment changes.
%[ 10/18/2019
%U https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.6.1