Near the end of the next decade Dietrich Schweitzer and Martin Hammer at the University of Jena (Jena, Thuringia, Germany) began publishing a series of reports on retinal oxygen saturation using spectral recordings.
33,34 They replaced the light scan with the entrance slit of an imaging spectrograph, which gave them a continuous spectrum of the light reflected from inside and outside a short section of vessel. By fitting their spectral curves with the known absorption for oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin, and the baseline retinal pigment, they could obtain a calibrated measurement. The Jena imaging spectrograph was also used to obtain optical properties from the complex tissue environment comprising the retinal vessel and fundus backround.
35,36 These recordings with multiple wavelengths, at single-vessel sites, produced a benchmark for the normal values of vessel saturation in the retina as well as changes in disease. Around the same time, two biomedical engineers, James Beach and Sankar Srinivas, working with retinal specialist James Tiedeman at the University of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA), were trying to adapt Delori's three wavelengths to digital imaging in order to obtain wider retinal coverage in diabetic subjects. They found that their filter wheel was too slow to keep up with eye motion and so this approach was abandoned. However, Srinivas noted that the arteries always showed up lighter than veins in red images. Beach had just done a series of intravital membrane potential recordings in microvessels with a voltage dye, which used the ratio of fluorescence at two wavelengths to compensate for vessel motion,
37 and so they tried a ratio method for retinal oxygen recordings. Digital cameras were quite expensive at that time, so a way to record two images at the same time with a single camera was needed. After building an image splitter from right angle prisms (
Fig. 1) and choosing red and green wavelengths for oxygen-sensitive and insensitive images, they succeeded in recording pairs of retinal images side-by-side on a digital camera (
Fig. 2). The green wavelength was set where the oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin curves crossed with equal and opposite slopes, which kept the reference image insensitive to saturation as the filter passed light over a finite spectral width. The red wavelength was set near the maximum of the oxy-deoxyhemoglobin difference spectrum for high sensitivity, but not so far to the red that the artery image disappeared. The new system was employed by Tiedeman et al.
38 to explore oxygen saturation changes during acute hyperglycemia in diabetic patients. His study showed that blood flow autoregulation in retinal vessels was impaired in preretinopathy to a degree that correlated with the disease duration. One year later the digital imaging method was reported after rigorously establishing the external calibration with breathing experiments using oxygen–nitrogen mixtures, and after assessing influences of the vessel diameter and retinal pigment density.
27 By estimating the amount of light falling on vessels using only the red light, where pigment absorption is reduced, variation of the saturation measurement was also reduced as the correction made the measurement less susceptible to variation in retinal background. Recording the two images simultaneously with a single (CCD) charge-coupled device camera precluded full retinal coverage (
Figs. 1 and
2), however, it was possible in single recordings to measure along several millimeters of artery and vein and determine the arterio-venous saturation difference. This digital two-wavelength method turned out to be serendipitously similar to Hickam's first photographic measurements, but the author did not know this until work was well along. The retinal two-wavelength method also relies on a “ratio of ratios” idea. The “first” ratio occurs in the logarithmic definition for OD. In the “second” ratio, both the sensitive and insensitive ODs are dependent on similar factors, such as vessel diameter and image focus. However, the sensitive OD is dependent on saturation while the insensitive OD is not. Therefore, the ratio of the two ODs, which has been termed the ODR, is sensitive to saturation, while other factors tend to cancel out. This “ODR” is converted to saturation values from an external calibration.