Dysli et al.
5 reported good repeatability of fluorescence lifetime using FLIO in healthy subjects. However, evaluation of repeatability with a nondilated pupil could be a potential limitation because of stronger fluorescence lifetime effects of the crystalline lens. Also, they used a standardized Early Treatment of Diabeti Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid for topographic distribution of lifetimes within the macula. In this manner, lifetime distribution of fovea, and the inner and outer rings could be analyzed, but the lifetime differences among superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal cannot be explored easily. We found good repeatability of fluorescence lifetime following mydriasis in the whole retina, and five different retinal zones in healthy subjects. Generally, for assessing reproducibility, analysis of exactly the same field of view is essential, because a small shift in the image position can yield large differences in the lifetime. Despite this anticipated problem, the repeatability of τ
m for the entire macula actually was as good as the individual ROIs in our study.
We previously reported the impact of mydriasis on FLIO measurement.
10 We observed that FLIO without mydriasis results in a longer τ
m in the SSC and also takes a longer time for image acquisition. In addition to implementing pupil dilation, we also applied a different strategy for evaluating FLIO data. Since the fluorescence lifetimes are measured throughout the entire retinal depth, the observed signals can be derived from a variety of different fluorophores. Typically, multiple fluorophores are excited simultaneously and the measured fluorescence decay represents the superposition of all individual decay components, which must be fitted into a multiexponential decay model, which is a well-established statistical exercise.
15 Therefore, to calculate fluorescence lifetimes from every single pixel, the exponential decay curves are representing the most prominent fluorophores. Generally, previous FLIO reports have applied a biexponential or triexponential curve fit to the FLIO data, and previous studies evaluated the repeatability of FLIO in healthy subjects applying biexponential decay curves.
5–9 Dysli et al.
15 reported that a biexponential curve fit appeared to be a useful strategy for evaluating FLIO data for most diseases. In our study, triexponential decay curve was applied for evaluating FLIO data. The use of higher order exponents can facilitate discrimination of more fluorophores, but higher exponents also require more photons for analysis, which may affect the repeatability of the study. In a pilot study in our center (unpublished) we observed a higher number of erroneous pixels, which the instrument displays as blue dots with a higher χ
2 value, in lifetime images derived from a biexponential fitting curve compared to a triexponential fitting curve. Given these differences between the two fitting strategies we deemed that the repeatability needed to be evaluated using the triexponential fitting strategy. To our knowledge, the repeatability of FLIO following mydriasis using a triexponential fit has not been evaluated. This is essential to establish, particularly in a normal population, before mydriatic FLIO imaging and triexponential fitting can be used evaluate eyes with disease.
Mean fluorescence lifetime ranged from 124 to 390 ps for SSC, and 189 to 355 ps in the LSC. Interindividual CVs in the fovea were 17% for the SSC and 11% for the LSC, and 6% to 12% for the inner and outer ETDRS ring areas in a previous study.
5 Moreover, mean fluorescence lifetime in the SSC was considerably shorter than that in the LSC. In our study, mean fluorescence lifetime ranged from 240 to 370 ps for SSC, and from 250 to 320 ps for LSC. Similar to previous studies, our interindividual CVs were 16% and 11% in the foveal region and 9% to 16% in other areas for the SSC and LLC, respectively. We presumed that the differences in absolute lifetime values between our study and previous reports reflects the different exponential decay curve analysis strategies, which highlights the importance of maintaining a consistent method across a study.
It is well known that the shortest τ
m are found in the foveal region, but the finding that τ
m in the temporal area for both channels, and τ
m of the nasal area in the SSC, are shorter than other areas has not been reported previously to our knowledge.
5–9 Similar to our study, Klemm et al.
10 reported the distribution of fluorescence often was inhomogeneous and fluorescence lifetime generally was independent of intensity. Greenberg et al.
16 also reported that autofluorescence intensities were greatest superotemporally and considered nonuniformities as instrument noise or the result of slight misalignment. In our study, we noted increased autofluorescence intensities in the temporal area during analysis of individual lifetime components, and also observed shorter lifetimes for the components (
Figs. 4,
5). The explanation for the difference in the temporal macula is uncertain, and warrants further investigation. Although subtle misalignment (e.g., decentration of the imaging from the exact center of the pupil) could be a contributor, we do not believe this fully explains our findings. We speculated that differences in vascular density could be contributing factors. The vascular density in our study was slightly higher (though not statistically significant) in the temporal and nasal regions, and showed a negative correlation with fluorescence lifetime. It is well known that vessels always show longer lifetime in FLIO images, a finding that has been attributed to the high collagen content in vessels.
5 However, most vessels in these regions were capillaries (not arterioles), and capillary walls are very thin and lack collagen. In addition, vessel density would not explain why the nasal retina did not also show a shorter
τm in LSC.
Similar to previous reports, we observed that
τm increased with age and retinal thickness.
5–8 Greenberg et al.
16 speculated that this might be due to lipofuscin accumulation with increasing age. A large volume and the strong autofluorescence of the crystalline lens could be another reason for age dependency of
τm. Interestingly, our study results indicated that the correlation of age with
τm in the SSC was stronger than with the LSC (
Fig. 6). Schweitzer et al.
6 reported that the crystalline lens had more of an effect on τ
3 of SSC than τ
3 of LSC. We hypothesized that, because we used the triexponential curve, which included τ
3 for τ
m calculation, τ
3 was more influenced by the crystalline lens in SSC, which resulted in higher correlation of τ
m with age in the SSC in our study.
In conclusion, FLIO techniques using a triexponential decay function yield fairly repeatable fluorescence lifetime values in healthy phakic participants following dilation. Mean fluorescence lifetimes in the fovea and temporal macula showed a shorter lifetime compared to other regions in the macula. In addition to age, retinal thickness and retinal vascular density also appeared to have some impact on lifetime values. These various factors that impact lifetime values should be considered when evaluating FLIO results in the setting of disease.