AK is a sight-threatening corneal infection, and early diagnosis is paramount in achieving a better prognosis and visual outcome. Risk factor determination and clinical examination can often differentiate AK from other forms of keratitis, with ring infiltrate or disease confined to the epithelium to be more common compared to bacterial and fungal keratitis.
22 However, in epithelial disease, especially associated with dendritic-type lesions,
Acanthamoeba can be misdiagnosed with other causes of keratitis, such as herpes simplex (HSV) keratitis.
4,10 Traditionally, cultures have been the mainstay in diagnosing
Acanthamoeba, but a low culture-positive rate
23 and prolonged incubation period often lead to a delay in diagnosis and treatment.
24 The use of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy and PCR in diagnosing AK have shown good promise, with sensitivity values ranging between 56% and 100%
25–28 and 77% and 88%, respectively.
16,29,30 The main advantages of IVCM are that it is noninvasive and it provides a rapid diagnosis, but the main limitations are the potential difficulty in differentiating pathogenic organisms from host cells and the diagnostic accuracy is dependent on observer experience.
26 PCR testing is quicker and more sensitive than culture, returning a result often within days rather than weeks, but similar to cultures, false-negative results do occur. Possible factors include the amount of viable
Acanthamoeba obtained from the corneal scrape or biopsy and an inhibition effect from the use of topical agents before microbiological sampling, such as prior empirical treatment with antibiotics, the use of anesthetics, and vital stains such as fluorescein.
17,31 There are limited data on the inhibitory effect of topical anesthetics, with one study showing that proparacaine (proxymetacaine) did not adversely affect PCR,
31 whereas in a second study,
17 they found oxybuprocaine inhibited real-time PCR in detecting
Acanthamoeba. We have found that the type of topical anesthetic greatly affected the viability of
Acanthamoeba in that lidocaine had a much lower antimicrobial effect and, at therapeutic concentration, it did not exert significant antimicrobial activity against cysts and trophozoites for two species of
Acanthamoeba. Although the lidocaine used in this study was combined with fluorescein, we did not find that testing fluorescein on its own had any major antimicrobial effect on the trophozoites or cysts. This contrasts with the other topical anesthetics, in particular tetracaine, which was observed to exert a much stronger antimicrobial effect against trophozoites and cysts of
Acanthamoeba and toxicity to a human cell line. The antimicrobial effect of proxymetacaine was similar to oxybuprocaine for
A. castellanii, but for
A. polyphaga, proxymetacaine had a greater amoebicidal and cysticidal effect, in addition to being more toxic to the human cell line. These results suggest that the use of topical anesthetics, especially with tetracaine, can have a potent antiamoebic effect and it may be an important contributory factor in the reported low sensitivity for culture from corneal scrape.