Overall, 54 eyes of 54 STGD patients (18 males) were included in the analysis, and all data were compared with 54 eyes of 54 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. All clinical and imaging findings are extensively reported in
Table 1. Duration of STGD, as assessed on the patients' report, was 12.8 ± 10.8 years. The standout finding was STGD patients showed statistically significant worse BCVA, structural OCT parameters, and OCTA parameters. Moreover, we detected significantly higher HF numbers, both within the retina and the choroid in our patients' cohort, with respect to the control group. Partial or complete foveal sparing was detected in 23 of 54 patients (43%). Correlation analyses revealed several statistically significant correlations (
Table 2). In more detail, BCVA was influenced by the integrity both of the retinal layers and vascular network. The presence of HF was found to correlate with worse BCVA. Furthermore, both retinal layer thickness and HF number significantly correlated with OCTA parameters. In particular, high VD and VT values were associated with better structural features and lower HF number, whereas high VDisp and VR values were related to worse retinal status and higher HF number. It is worth noting the higher significant correlations with both VD and VT, compared with VDisp and VR parameters. Statistically significant correlations were found when considering macular OCTA parameters alone, optic nerve head parameters showing unremarkable effects (
Figs. 1 and
2). Interestingly, retinal layer thickness showed a stronger correlation with VT values than with VD. In addition, as expected, OCTA parameters showed statistically significant correlations between them (
P < 0.01). No significant age or duration effect were detected. ROC analysis established a cutoff value based on the VT mean, to separate two subgroups with different BCVA, with both sensitivity and specificity of 0.9. A VT cutoff of 5 created two categories, a functionally and anatomically better STGD group (STGD1) and a worse group (STGD2) (
Table 3). Foveal sparing was present in 15 of 35 patients of STGD1 (43%) and in 8 of 19 patients of STGD2 (42%) (
P > 0.05), showing no effects on the analyses.