We thank The Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration (NYC) for timely retrieval of donor eyes and K.R. Sloan PhD with ImageJ analysis.
Supported by Genentech/Hoffman LaRoche, Heidelberg Engineering, The Macula Foundation, Inc., New York, NY; unrestricted funds to the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (UAB) from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., and EyeSight Foundation of Alabama.
Disclosure: L. Chen, None; M. Li, None; J.D. Messinger, None; D. Ferrara, Genentech (E); C.A. Curcio, Genentech (C), Hoffman LaRoche (C), Novartis (C), Heidelberg Engineering (C); K.B. Freund, Genentech (C), Optovue (C), Zeiss (C), Heidelberg Engineering (C), Allergan (C), Novartis (C)
Note added in proof: While this paper was in review, Hubschman et al published a consensus definition for lamellar macular hole based on OCT imaging and recommended that “lamellar-macular hole associated epiretinal proliferation”, as seen in our case, be called simply “epiretinal proliferation” because it is not specific to lamellar hole.
Hubschman, J. P., Govetto, A., Spaide, R. F., Schumann, R., Steel, D., Figueroa, M. S., Sebag, J., Gaudric, A., Staurenghi, G., Haritoglou, C., Kadonosono, K., Thompson, J. T., Chang, S., Bottoni, F., Tadayoni, R., 2020. Optical coherence tomography-based consensus definition for lamellar macular hole. Br J Ophthalmol. PMID 32107208.