We also demonstrate a notable, but nonsignificant, increase in RGC survival upon MSC treatment in our EAE mice by quantification of Brn3a
+ RGC. Brn3a
+ is generally a well-accepted RGC marker and is expressed in 80 to 90% of all RGC in the retina.
38 However, missing up to 20% of non-Brn3a
+ RGC could leave additional RGC rescue undetected. Furthermore, it is reported that Brn3a
+ is transiently downregulated in stressed but surviving RGCs.
39 It is conceivable that some surviving RGCs with decreased Brn3a
+ expression in our MSC-treated EAE group have not been detected, which could have led to an underestimation of the true RGC survival. This outcome might also be due to the nature of the MOG
35–55 EAE model, in which several studies aimed at RGC neuroprotection have indicated a huge variability in RGC survival from no to almost complete preservation.
40–42 An important factor on RGC survival in EAE models may be the timing of intervention and response of dosages, as nicely demonstrated by Wilmes et al.
41 The group of Shindler et al. reported a strong correlation on the magnitude RGC survival and the timepoint of corticosteroid intervention in the PLP-induced EAE model.
43 We used a single injection of MSC seven days after EAE induction and taking the half-life of MSC into consideration, a single MSC injection rather than multiple administrations might limit longer lasting neuroprotection as indicated by Payne et al.
44 On the other hand, we see a robust rescue effect of the PERG amplitude, preservation of the RNFL, and notable mitigation of RGC loss, which is indicative of a sustained effect on the visual system. Future experiments should place emphasis on subsequent follow-up MSC injections to increase RGC survival determined by RGC immunolabeling as an outcome measurement in this EAE model.