Dysli et al.
16 found a prolongation of lifetimes with increasing age, which has been found by many other groups as well.
18,21 In contrast to other studies, we were able to include pediatric subjects, with the youngest subject aged 9 years. This allows for a broader and more detailed analysis of FLIO lifetimes over the span of life. Interestingly, we found differences in the age effect on the two spectral channels. The SSC seems to be fairly unaffected by age until the age of approximately 35 years, and no significant correlation was found between age and FLIO lifetimes for subjects aged 35 years or younger, as can be seen in
Figure 3. Interestingly, a previous study that also included only young healthy subjects did not find a significant correlation of age and FLIO lifetimes in the SSC.
18 In that study, only the C of a standardized ETDRS grid was analyzed. Here 48 patients aged 20 to 37 years were included, and a significant correlation of FLIO lifetimes and age was only reported for the LSC. In contrast, we found a significant correlation of age and FLIO lifetimes within the C of the SSC, which is likely because we included a wider age span. This again shows that FLIO lifetimes from the SSC are only significantly affected by age when investigating patients above a certain age, and that it is likely that these changes start at approximately age 35 years. FLIO lifetimes from LSC show a much stronger correlation with age than those from the SSC. Furthermore, in the LSC, age and FLIO lifetimes significantly correlated in all areas of interest, whereas within the SSC, the correlation of age and FLIO lifetimes was significant for the C, as well as the IR, but not for the OR. These differences may seem very subtle, but we think that it can help us understand the different influences we have when using FLIO. First, the two spectral channels were initially chosen based on the fluorescence emission spectrum of lipofuscin.
26 Therefore by investigating both spectral channels, it is likely that we may be able to distinguish between a channel with a strong influence of lipofuscin fluorescence (LSC), and a channel without or at least with significantly reduced lipofuscin influence (SSC).
1 We therefore strongly believe that we observe the accumulation of lipofuscin within the RPE over time in the LSC. This would explain the very strong correlation of lifetimes with age in the LSC, starting at a very young age and increasing continuously with advancing age. The SSC, however, might be relatively independent of lipofuscin. However, it has been shown in many studies that the SSC is influenced by the autofluorescence of the lens.
3,5,16,27,28 As young individuals typically have a clear lens, this influence is not as strong when investigating younger or middle-aged groups of patients.
6,18,19 We therefore may consider that the influence of the lens is not linearly increasing with age, but rather affects older individuals more strongly. If we assume that the lens causes the changes over time in the SSC, this would explain why there is a weaker correlation in young individuals (ages 35 and younger). Furthermore, it is interesting that the OR does not show a significant correlation in these young patients, whereas the IR and C do. This could be due to a confounder, such as the centrally localized MP.
18 However, it may be possible that the lens influence is not uniform across the fundus, but that the C may be more strongly affected by the lens due to a weaker retinal fluorescence within the C, which again is mostly caused by macular pigment.
18,29 Although most of the MP should be located within the C of the ETDRS grid, there may be a small influence of this in the IR as well. The OR, however, should be independent of this. If we assume this to be true, there might be a small influence of the lens even before age 35 years. This should be investigated in larger studies focusing on the lens effect specifically. Furthermore, patients with artificial IOLs seem to show much shorter FLIO lifetimes.
Figure 2 shows these individuals as black dots, and these patients seem to form a separate cloud of lifetimes that appears to be less affected by age in the SSC, whereas these dots fit well in the correlation in the LSC for the most part. This shows that the lens likely has a smaller influence on the LSC and may mostly be important in patients with cataracts.
27,28 A further study including larger numbers of patients with artificial IOLs would be helpful to better understand this influence. All of these findings, however, support that the SSC is likely strongly affected by the influence of the lens, and that an impact of the lens can especially be expected in patients and subjects starting at an age of 35 years. The LSC, however, shows a constant prolongation of FLIO lifetimes with increasing age, starting in childhood, supported by the significant correlation of FLIO lifetimes from the LSC with age even in young subjects. Based on this, we can conclude that the LSC is less influenced by the lens and may show age-related changes more reliably.