The results presented here support the presence of amyloid-containing aggregates in the retinas of an AD mouse model and human AD patients that can be identified using ARCAM-1. Consistent with reports of curcumin labeling amyloid deposits in retinal tissue, our results support the hypothesis that AD pathology also emerges in the eye. Notably, in contrast to the maximum fluorescence emission wavelength of curcumin when bound to amyloids (∼550 nm), utilizing the specific emission signature of ARCAM-1 when bound to amyloid (515–525 nm) allows for identification of the presence of β-amyloid-containing aggregates in retinal layers that could otherwise be mistaken for common autofluorescence (550–590 nm).
26,27 We also found that the average size of aggregates in the human retina labeled by ARCAM-1 (147.1 ± 32.0 µm
2,
Supplementary Table S1) was smaller than those reportedly labeled by curcumin (∼520 µm
2).
18 When ARCAM-1 was applied to retinas from human patients, we observed an apparent high degree of amyloid-containing aggregates in AD patients compared to healthy controls (
Supplementary Figs. S12a, d). Cursory inspection found ARCAM-1–labeled amyloid-containing deposits throughout the retina. Interestingly, there appeared to be a higher density of labeled deposits in the superior region of the retina from AD compared to the superior region of the retina of CN patients, which is consistent with previous reports that suggest that amyloid-containing deposits are more prevalent in the superior region of retinas from AD patients (
Supplementary Figs. S12c, e and
Supplementary Fig. S13).
6,7 To examine whether these qualitative observations were statistically significant, we treated the number of observed amyloid deposits from multiple 1.6 mm
2 image fields of the five patients as either 1) independent measurements or 2) as averaged densities per patient prior to statistical analyses. In the former case, we found that the density of labeled deposits was significantly higher for AD patients compared to control patients, and that there was a significantly higher density of labeled deposits in the superior region of the retina from AD compared to the superior region of the retina of CN patients (
Supplementary Figs. S12a, c). However, while we found a similar trend in the data when we first averaged the density of labeled objects per patient, the data did not reach statistical significance (
Supplementary Figs. S12d, e). We note, though, that stratifying patients simply as AD or CN does not account for the heterogeneity in the spatial distribution of amyloid-containing deposits in the retina or for differences in the abundance of retinal amyloid-containing deposits that could correlate with disease progression (i.e., the AD classification encompasses a spectrum of the disease from mild to severe). Due to the limited number of samples available for this study, we could not adequately account for these important parameters in our analyses and, thus, our results may not be representative of the general population.