We constructed the PSL D20 keeping in mind three major constraints faced in present times: fewer portable devices for screening the anterior segment, travelling constraints in remote areas, operational complexities of available portable slit lamps, higher costs, and a lack of objective, instantaneous photodocumentation. The devices reported in literature in the past have focused on ideas to improve screening methods using portable slit lamps. Kumar et al.
2 used the Lion's Eye Institute Portable Slit lamp camera, with a fixed slit beam. Image documentation was done by freezing a video frame, captured on a video camera fixed as a part of the device and compared with those on a standard Zeiss (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) 40SL/P slit lamp camera in terms of image quality. It showed that pathologies like cataracts and corneal grafts and opacities were equally well detected in both devices.
2 This trial was key in proving that digital images on the portable slit lamp were of equal diagnostic quality in comparison to traditional slit lamps in case of gross corneal pathologies. Posterior subcapsular opacities, lid pathologies, and a few in the iris could not be well-detected in this case. A major drawback here was the fixed slit thickness. Other factors hampering the quality of images in this study were lack of maneuvering capacity for the operators, leading to limited focusing, and a shallow depth of focus. Multiple studies have shown acceptable image quality using adaptors with smartphones, to mimic portable screening systems.
16–18 However, few have focused on the criticality of slit thickness when it comes to anterior segment imaging. Specialists in ophthalmology imaging need a narrow slit light that is thinner than the pupil width of 2 to 8 mm to ensure that the slit light reaches the crystalline lens.
19 Recently, Hu et al.
20 reported another smartphone-based adaptor to screen for cataracts—but this was not a full-fledged portable slit lamp. The device was effective in focusing on the anterior capsule, cortex, and posterior capsule of the lens of the eye. A drawback in this case was adjusting the light intensity. Moving the patient to a dimly lit room or making them wear a dark chamber would also hamper the focus of the device. There was no mention of any light filter that could be used to suit specific illumination needs, like tracing inflamed blood vessels, viewing hemorrhages, examining the tear film, or viewing damaged corneal epithellia.
20 A study by Yazu et al.
16 demonstrated a portable smartphone-based screening device to screen and grade nuclear cataracts. Their design, called the Smart Eye Camera, is based on a 3D printed adapter that could be attached to a smartphone camera used for capturing and grading nuclear cataracts in human eyes.
16,21 However, it was only reported to have been used for grading nuclear cataracts. Moreover, there was no traceability in terms of image resolution and magnification for this device against standard slit lamps.
16 A commercially available portable slit lamp, S150 (MediWorks, Shanghai, China) can attach a smartphone to its magnetic pad to digitize the device. A drawback here is the lack of a proper casing or holding pad for the smartphone that may alter the focus. There is no headrest to support or stabilize the focus of the device and no mention of a red-free filter as well.
22 A list of features distinguishing PSL D20 from other commercially available portable slit lamps is presented in
Table 4.