January 2022
Volume 11, Issue 1
Open Access
Erratum  |   January 2022
Erratum in: Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression
Translational Vision Science & Technology January 2022, Vol.11, 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.20
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Erratum in: Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2022;11(1):20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.1.20.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Erratum in: “Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression” by Ann L. Webber, Thomas R. Mandall, Darcy T. Molloy, Lucas J. Lister, and Eileen E. Birch (Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9(4):9), https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.4.9
  • 1. In the Methods section titled “Size of Suppression Zone,” “bifoveal for targets that fell between 0.67° and 1°, macular for targets that were within 2° to 4°” has been changed for clarity to “bifoveal for targets that fell between 0.67° and 1°, macular for targets that were >1° to 4°.”
  • 2. In the Results, first sentence, “(mean age 25.2 [range 12–69] years)” has been changed to “(mean age 26.6 [range 12–61] years).” The range “12–69 years” has been changed to “12–61 years” in the first sentence of the Methods section in the Abstract as well.
  • 3. Classifications in Table 2 were based on Worth 4 App responses from both distances, 33 cm and 90 cm, so the column one header “W4DApp @ 33cm” has been changed to “W4DApp.”
  • 4. There was an error in the visual acuity data for the 15th patient listed in the Appendix table. Rather than 0.00 and 0.20 logMAR, the visual acuity should be –0.10 and 0.06 logMAR. As a result, this participant should be categorized as “Strabismic” rather than “Strabismic amblyope.” In addition, the interocular difference in visual acuity for this patient should be 0.16 instead of 0.20. These changes have been made in the article online.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×