Cataract grading schemes have been developed to quantitatively measure lens density, opacity, and morphology.
41 With the development of cataract grading systems, clinicians can better assess, grade, and monitor cataract formation and provide better treatment for patients with advanced technology. Most current grading systems are detailed classifications based on standardized images.
4,6,42–45 The most widely used system is the LOCSIII, which is a well-recognized subjective assessment scheme for age-related cataracts.
10 Other grading systems, such as the Oxford Clinical Cataract Classification and Grading System, the classification system proposed by the Japanese Cooperative Cataract Epidemiology Study Group, and the use of a computer program and anterior segment OCT to grade lens density are well correlated with the LOCSIII grading scheme, reflecting cortical opacities, nuclear opacities, and subcapsular opacities.
41,46,47 The study of cataract classification by OCT is not common, but investigating anterior segments by this imaging technique is becoming increasingly popular. Recently, some studies have proposed using cross-sectional, two-dimensional OCT images to grade the scattering produced by the nucleus and have found a positive correlation with the LOCSIII grading.
17,18 In addition, in vivo OCT images of cataract crystalline lenses in rhesus monkeys were found to be directly correlated with the cataract lesions seen on corresponding histopathologic sections, demonstrating the potential of this imaging technique for cataract recognition and characterization.
48 In contrast to the Pentacam, which automatically determines lens density, the degree of lens opacity obtained by swept-source OCT is calculated by using image analysis software to artificially draw the regions of interest, an approach similar to our research method.
49,50 Therefore, our study mainly compares UBM and the Pentacam. Comparing UBM, OCT, and the Pentacam will be the main content of our next research.