LSFG signals in the regions absent from large retinal vessels were investigated in this study. The background area in a LSFG map is defined as the locations where retinal vessels cannot be resolved. Due to the limitation of spatial resolution in the LSFG, only large blood vessels can be identified in the retina. Therefore, the background area includes all the rest regions, containing retinal capillaries, nonvessel tissue, choroidal vessels, and stroma. The background area in this study has a similar concept to the “tissue area” in some other LSFG studies, but with the emphasis that retinal capillaries and choroidal vessels are also presented in these regions.
33–35 Retinal capillaries can contribute to the background LSFG signals in certain ways, although they are barely resolved. In principle, the blood flows in the capillaries can decorrelate the speckles, although at a much lower level compared with those in the arteries or veins. This variation of speckles can be reflected as a general increase of the signal floor within a certain area without showing specific vessel morphology. For example, LSFG revealed postocclusive reactive hyperemia in forearms where blood vessels are unresolvable.
36 Similarly, blood flows in the choroidal vessel can also contribute to the background LSFG signals. However, the choroidal signals are vulnerable to the retinal signals due to choroid vessels being deeply beneath the retina. Therefore, the background LSFG signals can have multiple sources.
Two parameters regarding the LSFG, PWM and PWA, were employed in this study. PWM measured the averaged intensity and PWA measured the amplitude of the pulse waveform of the LSFG signals. Physiologically, PWM reflects the total blood volume that went through the sampling location during the recording period. In comparison, PWA correlates the pulse pressure, which is the difference between the systolic pressure and diastolic pressure. With the consideration that small vessels have weaker pulsations compared with the large vessels, PWM can also reflect more information about the flows in the small vessels, while PWA majorly represents the flows in the large vessels.
37,38 An important observation is the nonuniform spatial distribution (i.e., topography) of the LSFG signals in the background area. The topography of the LSFG signals was also different between individuals. Although it was not emphasized, the spatially variant topography of the LSFG signals has been observed in many previous studies.
16,39–42 Apparently, the background LSFG signals reflect the local blood flows, but this should not be simply attributed to either the retinal or choroidal signals without knowing the structural and vascular information about the retina and choroid.
To address this issue, OCT and OCTA were adopted in this study to provide metrics that separately depict the structural and vascular attributes of retina and choroid at a high spatial resolution. The results showed that both PWM and PWA were weakly or not correlated with the retinal metrics. In comparison, they were significantly correlated with CT and CVV. The strong correlation between CVV and the LSFG signals is straightforward since larger blood vessel volume corresponds to more blood flows that contribute to the LSFG signals. The significant correlation between CT and the LSFG signals may be attributed to the case that thicker choroid can contain more vessels. However, both PWM and PWA did not present a significant correlation with CVI, which reflected the volume density of the choroidal vessels in the choroidal tissue. Therefore, the results indicate that the LSFG signals in the background regions were dominated by the amount of blood flow in the choroid. Nevertheless, the results should not disprove the contribution of the retinal blood flows to the LSFG signals. In theory, blood flows in the unresolvable retinal capillaries can still decorrelate the laser speckle and contribute to the LSFG signals. In fact, in some cases, the retinal metrics presented weak correlations with PWM and PWA (
Figs. 6,
7). Future works that use shorter wavelength lasers with limited penetration within the retina can further illustrate the retinal contribution to the LSFG signals.
There are limitations in this study. First, the OCT and OCTA metrics employed in this study quantified the geometrical attributes of the retinal and choroidal structure and vasculature, such as the thickness and density, instead of the real blood flow in the vessels. In principle, these metrics are associated with the blood flows since the flow attributes, such as flow velocity and resistance, are associated with the geometrical properties of the vessels.
37,38 Since there lacks a method to separately measure the flow in retina and choroid, we chose to use these OCT and OCTA metrics to represent the blood perfusions. Second, the identification of the large retinal vessels was based on the 6-mm × 6-mm en face OCTA images of the retina, using a custom-designed algorithm and a global threshold. The performance of the large vessel identification relied on the quality of the OCTA images and the sensitivity limitation of the algorithm. Small portions of large vessels could be missed at some locations (arrowheads in
Figs. 1C,
1F), but these missed vessels should not alter the general trend of the correlations as their overall area was relatively small compared with the vessel area that was successfully identified. Third, the size difference of the large retinal vessels in the LSFG and OCTA maps was not precisely calibrated. As a compromise, the vessel areas identified in the retinal OCTA maps were dilated by a certain number of pixels to generate the vessel mask that was then applied to other maps. The results showed that the large retinal vessels in the LSFG maps were reasonably removed (
Fig. 1), but further efforts can still be spent on optimizing the large vessel mask to involve more background areas for analysis. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the contribution of retinal and choroidal blood flows in the LSFG signals. Therefore, only healthy eyes were involved, and the influence of age was not considered. Moreover, the population number was also relatively small. Future studies with a larger population and age range, and patients with different diseases, such as DR, AMD, and glaucoma, are desirable to better illustrate the signal sources in LSFG and confirm its clinical significance.
In summary, the topographic correlations between the background LSFG signals and the retinal and choroidal structural and vascular metrics at the corresponding area were established in this study. Our results demonstrate that choroid flows dominate the LSFG signals at the areas without large retinal vessels and indicate that LSFG is a useful technique in the study of eye diseases that are correlated with choroidal blood perfusion abnormalities, such as AMD and central serous chorioretinopathy.