Our work had certain limitations. First, nonoptical MRI imaging is associated with inaccuracies in resolution limits and also magnetic gradient field nonlinearities and magnetic field inhomogeneities.
28 The latter two inaccuracies are of particular concern in areas evidencing large differences in magnetic susceptibilities, such as the anterior eye.
29 Our 3D MRI volume acquisitions were centered on the posterior eye; this reduced errors. Second, the correction algorithms that we used do not consider the magnification errors corrected using the Littmann formula.
30 However, the latter does not correct image shape; our method corrects the optical paths of both the system and the eye and thus simultaneously adjusts both the magnification and the shape. Our use of the Listing eye model was based on a previous report that successfully used this algorithm to correct the shapes of OCT images.
7 Third, we could not convert the original sagittal MRI images, rather only reconstructed images from the axial scans. As time elapses between an axial and a sagittal scan, the patient’s posture changes. The limited resolution of reconstructed sagittal images renders it difficult to accurately measure the deep neural canal; the use of original sagittal images would have been preferable. Fourth, our model eye assumed that the visual and the optical axes coincided, which is not the case.
4 Although the macular position was based on these assumptions, convergence was based largely on the continuity of the scleral boundary between MRI and OCT images and the overlap agreement revealed by ASCO. We considered the κ angle and used the visual axis to broadly outline the fovea. We combined the high-resolution OCT area with the wide-imaging MRI region; we plan to inspect the deep neural canal. Fifth, the OCT image was corrected while drawing an arc of the same radius from the nodal point, following the assumption of the Listing reduced eye model. However, the actual shape of the eyeball is different from the Listing reduced eye, and also the position of the nodal point may not be as constant. However, the results of Kuo et al.
7 show that the error between the actual ray that arrives in the eye (analytical correction) and the estimation using the reduced model (numerical correction) is roughly 0.3 mm in radial curvature. We also have calculated
d1 lateral distortion for an average AXL of eyes in our analysis (
Supplementary Fig. S1). The positions of the outermost point (purple point) in the uncorrected OCT and the outermost point (green) in the corrected OCT image are displayed. For a horizontal scan of 12 mm, lateral distortion is 0.28 mm, which is only 4.67% of horizontal length, which is not expected to have a significant effect on the measured value.