In this study, data regarding RE were obtained by autorefraction and data for AL were obtained using optical techniques. RE measurements can be done by both objective and subjective methods. The objective methods, including autorefraction and retinoscopy, are used in the measurement of laboratory animals and offer the benefits of high efficiency, accuracy, and repeatability. Because objective measurements are usually taken with the animal under anesthesia after cycloplegia, the refractive state differs from that when the animal is awake.
26 Subjective refraction is a method to measure an animal's functional RE. Investigators use behavioral measurements to obtain the optimal lens power that yields sufficient contrast sensitivity for high spatial frequency grating targets.
27 But, this process is time consuming and relies on the cooperation of the animal. In the study by Hung et al.,
26 autorefraction and retinoscopy yielded similar results for refractive error, but, compared with subjective measures, the objective measures yielded higher amounts of hyperopia. In most studies of ocular measurements of rhesus macaques, refractive states are obtained by objective methods.
16,21,28 In our study, we also used the convenient and repeatable autorefraction approach to obtain RE in the large-scale screening of rhesus macaques. AL can be obtained with both optical and ultrasound techniques. A-scan ultrasound biometry is the traditional method to obtain ocular dimension data in vivo. The advantage of ultrasound measurement is that it is not affected by optical media opacity. A disadvantage is that it requires placing the ultrasound probe on the corneal apex, which increases the risk of corneal abrasion and infection. Optical methods, based on the principles of low-coherence interferometry, partial coherence interferometry, and swept-source optical coherence tomography, allow ocular parameters to be obtained in a non-contact way.
29 In humans, optical measurements have been shown to be more reliable and accurate than ultrasound techniques, because the ultrasound probe compresses the cornea.
30 She et al.
23 proposed that inter-instrument discrepancies might be the result of differences in ocular size and component dimensions between animals and humans.
23 In the study by She et al.,
23 the data obtained by optical measurement were consistent with data obtained by ultrasound in young rhesus macaques; therefore, optical measurement was a precise method for measuring AL in this study.