We showed ipsilateral eyes had reduced retinal microvascular densities when compared to contralateral eyes in patients with CAS; after excluding eyes with TMB, significant differences remained. In our CAS cohort, microvascular densities only correlated with the length of stenosis, but not with stenosis degree. In the subgroup analysis, a significant association of stenosis degree with microvascular densities was found in the patients with severe stenosis. We suggest that the length of carotid stenosis in CAS may be linked with retinal microvascular changes.
CAS has been suggested to result in substantial decreases in ocular blood flow. Previous reports using different ophthalmic imaging tools have shown that patients with CAS have reduced retinal blood flow compared to controls.
21,22 Similarly, reports using OCTA have shown that ipsilateral eyes have reduced retinal microvasculature when compared to contralateral eyes,
7,8,10,23,24 which is consistent with our findings. Moreover, in our study, after excluding eyes with TMB, significant differences remained. TMB or amaurosis fugax, an important clinical symptomatic manifestation of CAS,
4,25 is linked with low retinal perfusion. Identifying these retinal microvascular changes during the asymptomatic phase of CAS may help clinicians to apply earlier implementations of treatment which may help slow down the progression of the disease.
The length of carotid artery stenosis is suggested as an important predictor of ischemic stroke and relevant death
16 because patients with longer stenosis length are more likely to suffer embolism due to the increased risk of dislodging atherosclerotic fragments or thrombus. Besides, it is suggested that the length of carotid stenosis may have a significant impact on the antegrade blood flow of ICA and cerebral artery blood flow
14 in the setting of CAS. We showed that there was a significant correlation between reduced retinal microvascular densities and the length of carotid stenosis in our CAS cohort, indicating that the longer the carotid plaque length, the lower the retinal microvascular densities and vice versa.
The degree of carotid stenosis is considered an indicator of increased ischemic stroke risk of patients with CAS in several studies.
26–30 Shakur et al.
13 used magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and DSA to show that increasing degree of stenosis resulted in significantly decreased antegrade ICA blood flow in patients with CAS. A previous study
31 using the retinal camera in patients with CAS demonstrated that as the degree of carotid artery stenosis increased, the diameter of the retinal vessels around the optic nerve head decreased significantly. However, we showed that an increased degree of stenosis plaque only correlated with decreased retinal microvascular densities in our patients with severe CAS. We suggest that retinal microvascular changes are more sensitive to severe stenosis degree, and retinal microvasculature may not be affected by moderate or even mild stenosis. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate our hypothesis.
Recent reports
32,33 suggest that carotid plaque length is an important predictor of stroke; similarly, retinal microvascular changes are suggested to be a risk of stroke.
34,35 The significant correlation between retinal microvascular changes and carotid plaque length in our CAS cohort could indicate that quantitative measurement of the retinal microvasculature may help identify CAS individuals with a high risk of stroke. A thorough understanding of the retinal microvasculature can help assess the clinical validity of carotid plaque length in patients with CAS. Such an in vivo quantitative means of assessing disease may allow monitoring of CAS and enable the assessment of purported treatments to prevent the incidence of stroke. The development of a scoring system based on imaging features of plaque vulnerability with retinal imaging may also provide clinicians with better tools for managing the disease.
Although the carotid duplex ultrasound is suggested as a screening tool for assessing carotid stenosis and measurement of plaque, it has the following limitations: (1) quality of the ultrasound image and judgement regarding the plaque are influence by the clinician's expertise; and (2) position of the carotid ultrasound on the patient during examination may lead to weak blood flow signal which may affect the results. DSA is considered as the “gold standard” for carotid artery stenosis diagnosis and has a high accuracy value in determining the degree and length of carotid plaque.
36 Although retinal imaging cannot replace the DSA in assessing the morphology of the carotid plaque, we showed a novel association between the retinal microvascular densities of the retinal plexuses and the length of stenosis in our CAS cohort suggesting that microvascular changes are affected by the length of stenosis. Thus, retinal imaging offers a complementary approach to the DSA tool and has considerable clinical potential.
We would like to acknowledge some limitations in this study. First, our sample size was relatively small. This was due to our strict sampling criteria and increased incidence of ophthalmic diseases, such as AMD and severe cataracts in patients with CAS. Moreover, our patients did not undergo comprehensive ophthalmological examinations, such as axial length examination and intraocular pressure examination; although our study excluded patients with high myopia, adjusting for axial length may result in precise data. Fundus photographs were reviewed by an ophthalmologist to help exclude confounding ocular disease; however, fundus photographs alone cannot exclude mild ocular pathologies that could have confounded the OCTA results, such as mild glaucoma. Moreover, even though ONH imaging was done in our study participants, we did not analyze their structural and microvascular parameters. Another limitation of our study was that we only analyzed the retinal microvasculature in patients with CAS. Future studies may explore the ONH and retinal structure in patients with CAS. In addition, our study did not include a comparison group, which should be considered in future studies; the effects of interventions like carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy could be investigated in the future.