This prospective feasibility study was undertaken in the neonatal unit of Princess Royal Maternity, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. Eligible babies were those at risk of ROP according to UK national screening guidelines.
1 Exclusion criteria included conjunctivitis or congenital ocular anomaly. The planned sample size was chosen as a convenience number for a preliminary, feasibility investigation. Eligible participants' parents or guardians were invited to participate and given an information leaflet. Time was allowed to consider the request and ask questions. Parents/guardians of all participating infants gave written consent to participate. The study was approved by NHS Health Research Authority, Yorkshire and The Humber - Leeds East Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 21/YH/0214) and adheres to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Gestational age (GA), birth weight, postnatal age (PNA), and oxygen use at sample collection, daily weight gain from birth until sample collection, ethnicity, and ROP status were noted. Postnatal age was added to GA to calculate postmenstrual age (PMA) at sample collection. A postnatal growth ROP (G-ROP) score was calculated and used to stratify infants as high or low risk for ROP. The G-ROP scores expand 2 national screening criteria, with a lower GA of 28 weeks and a lower birth weight of 1051 g. It also incorporates three additional measurements of postnatal weight gain (<120 g 10–19 days PNA, <180 g 20–29 days PNA, and <170 g 30–39 days PNA) and presence or absence of hydrocephalus.
17
Tear sample collection was timed to coincide with routine ROP screening. Screening continued as per national guidelines and was not altered for this study. Tear samples were collected by placing strips of Schirmer's paper under the upper or lower eyelids (see
Fig. 1). Proxymetacaine, cyclopentolate, and phenylephrine eye drops were administered to all infants for ROP screening as per local protocol: Schirmer strips were placed before administration of drops in some infants, and afterward in others, and the order was noted for qualitative observation of comfort and tear quantity. If instilled before tear sampling, proxymetacaine was instilled immediately before, whereas cyclopentolate and phenylephrine were instilled 0.5 to 1 hours before. Samples were collected from one or from both eyes. The number of millimeters of tear wetting was measured from the notch on the Schirmer's paper with a nominal target collection duration of 5 minutes, lengthened or shortened depending on factors such as infant's care and degree of wetting. To assess ease of sampling, the number of staff required was recorded and the collector graded ease of collection from one to five, one being the easiest. Strips were stored in Eppendorf containers where proteins were eluted, solubilized, and reduced directly from the Schirmer's paper strips into SDT buffer (4% w/v SDS, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, and 100 mM DTT). These were then frozen immediately at −20 degrees Celsius. Samples from both eyes of any infant were combined in the container.
The filter-aided sample preparation method
18 (alkylating using iodoacetamide) was used for trypsin digestion and dried down completely. Peptides were then resuspended in 100 mM TEAB before being tandem mass tagging (TMT) labeled, as per the manufacturer's guidelines for the 6-plex TMT reagent kits (Thermo Scientific). Peptides from patients 1 to 6 were tagged with TMT
6-126 to 131 labels of one kit and peptides from patients 7 to 12 were tagged with TMT
6-126 to 131 labels of a second kit. After labeling, peptides from patients 1 to 6 and patients 7 to 12 were mixed together as TMT batches 1 and 2 (1 ug total protein per TMT batch), respectively, before drying down completely and freezing at −20 degrees Celsius until MS analysis.
Dried peptides residues were solubilized in 20 µL 5% acetonitrile with 0.5% formic acid using the auto-sampler of a nanoflow ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (uHPLC) system (RSLCnano; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Online detection of peptide ions was by electrospray ionization (ESI) MS with an Orbitrap Fusion MS (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Ionization of liquid chromatography (LC) eluent was performed by interfacing the LC coupling device to an Triversa NanoMate (Advion Bioscience, Ithaca, NY, USA) with an electrospray voltage of 1.7 kV. An injection volume of 5 µL of the reconstituted protein digest was desalted and concentrated for 10 minutes on trap column (0.3 × 5 mm) using a flow rate of 25 µL/min with 1% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Peptide separation was performed on a Pepmap C18 reversed phase column (50 cm × 75 µm, particle size 2 µm, and pore size 100 Å; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using a solvent gradient at a fixed solvent flow rate of 0.3 mL/min for the analytical column. The solvent composition was (A) 0.1% formic acid in water, and (B) 0.08% formic acid in 80% acetonitrile 20% water. The solvent gradient was 4% B for 1.5 minutes, 4 to 60% for 178.5 minutes, and 60 to 99% for 15 minutes, held at 99% for 5 minutes. A further 10 minutes at initial conditions for column re-equilibration was used before the next injection.
The Orbitrap Fusion acquires a high-resolution precursor scan at 120,000 reversed phase (RP; over a mass range of mass to charge ratio [m/z] 400–1600) followed by top speed (2.5 seconds) collision induced dissociation (CID) fragmentation (35%) and detection of the top precursor ions from the MS scan in the linear ion trap using turbo scan speed. Triple stage mass spectrometry-based approach (MS3) higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD; 55%) is performed on the top ions from the double stage MS approach (MS2) CID scan, with up to 10 Synchronous Precursor Selection (SPS) scans isolated with the precursor ion and any TMT loss ions excluded from the selection. Orbitrap detection of the TMT quantitation label from the MS3 fragmentation is acquired at a resolution of 30,000 (for 6-plex)) with a mass range 100 to 500 m/z.
Maxquant version 1.6.14.0
19 was used to search raw files with default settings for MS3 6-plex TMT reporter quantification utilizing isobaric matching between runs. The two 6-plex TMT batches were directly compared by using PSM-level normalization to generate normalization ratios for TMT reporter intensities,
20 before being further normalized by median centering/log
2 transformation. Statistical analysis of tear proteomes was carried out in Perseus version 1.6.14.0.
21