October 2024
Volume 13, Issue 10
Open Access
Retina  |   October 2024
Automated Posterior Scleral Topography Assessment for Enhanced Staphyloma Visualization and Quantification With Improved Maculopathy Correlation
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Ying Xiang Han
    Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
  • Xiao Xiao Guo
    Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Ya Xing Wang
    Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China
  • Jost B. Jonas
    Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China
    Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Institut Français de Myopie, Paris, France
  • Xi Chen
    Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • Xiao Fei Wang
    Laboratory for Biomechanics and Mechanobiology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
    Eye Hospital, School of Ophthalmology and Optometry and School of Biomedical Engineering, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
  • Correspondence: Xiao Fei Wang, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Room 424, Building 5, 37 Xueyuan Road, Beijing 10083, China. e-mail: xiaofei.wang@buaa.edu.cn 
  • Xi Chen, Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100052, China. e-mail: xichen@ccmu.edu.cn 
Translational Vision Science & Technology October 2024, Vol.13, 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.10.41
  • Views
  • PDF
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ying Xiang Han, Xiao Xiao Guo, Ya Xing Wang, Jost B. Jonas, Xi Chen, Xiao Fei Wang; Automated Posterior Scleral Topography Assessment for Enhanced Staphyloma Visualization and Quantification With Improved Maculopathy Correlation. Trans. Vis. Sci. Tech. 2024;13(10):41. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.10.41.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: To quantitatively characterize the posterior morphology of high myopia eyes with posterior staphyloma.

Methods: Surface points of the eyeball were automatically extracted from magnetic resonance imaging scans using deep learning. Subsequently, the topography of posterior staphylomas was constructed to facilitate accurate visualization and quantification of their location and severity. In the three-dimensional Cartesian coordinate system established with surface points, measurements of distances (D) from each point to the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center within the eyeball and local curvatures (C) at each point on the posterior sclera were computed. Using this data, specific parameters were formulated. The concordance of these parameters with traditional staphyloma classification methods and their association with myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) grades based on the ATN classifications were investigated.

Results: The study included 102 eyes from 52 participants. The measured parameters, particularly the variance of distance (Dvar) and the maximum value of the curvature and distance product (C · Dmax), demonstrated efficacy in differentiating various types of posterior staphyloma and exhibited strong correlations with the grades of MTM.

Conclusions: The automated generation of the posterior scleral topography facilitated visualization and quantification of staphyloma location and severity. Simple geometric parameters can quantify staphyloma shape and correlate well with retinal complications. Future works on expanding these measures to more imaging modalities could improve their clinical use and deepen insights into the link between posterior staphyloma and related retinal diseases.

Translational Relevance: This work has the potential to be translated into clinical practice, allowing for the accurate assessment of staphyloma severity and ultimately improving disease management.

Introduction
Posterior staphyloma is an outpouching or bulging of the posterior sclera of the eyeball,13 commonly associated with high myopia and pathologic myopia.48 It is markedly associated with myopic maculopathy.912 A valid classification of posterior staphylomas plays a crucial role in the management and research of pathologic myopia.1316 
Previous studies have primarily graded posterior staphylomas using ophthalmoscopy and conventional photographic fundus images. Later, three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), have been applied. The 3D MRI, in particular, has significantly enhanced the visualization of staphylomas assessing the whole eye shape without optical distortions commonly associated with OCT imaging.1720 Despite these advancements, most studies have relied on subjective classification methods, merely categorizing the posterior scleral shape based on its appearance. For instance, Moriyama et al.19 classified the posterior shape of eyes into four types based on ocular elongation and symmetry: nasally distorted, temporally distorted, cylinder-shaped, and barrel-shaped. Guo et al.14 and Luo et al.16 expanded this classification, introducing additional staphyloma types such as spheroidal, conical, ellipsoidal, and barrel-shaped staphylomas. Although these studies have broadened our understanding of the posterior eye shape, they have predominantly lacked quantitative measures, relying on subjective assessments with considerable variability. Recent methodologies, such as the application of Zernike coefficients for the characterization of the eyeball morphology have attempted to bridge this gap.21 However, the explainability has been limited, and their correlations with macular complications have remained unclear. Therefore a more precise, quantitative measurement of the posterior scleral shape is needed for the classification of posterior staphylomas with clinical relevance. 
The aim of this study was to develop methods to automatically generate a posterior scleral topography from 3D MRI images and to establish quantitative measurements for staphyloma shape. The topography and quantitative measurements were designed to improve the conventional classification of posterior staphylomas and to investigate its association with the severity of macular complications. Ultimately, this research intends to provide a more objective and consistent methodology for posterior scleral shape assessment, potentially leading to improved diagnostic and treatment strategies for conditions associated with posterior staphyloma. 
Methods
Subjects Recruitment and MRI Imaging
The hospital-based study included highly myopic patients who participated in a follow-up study on high myopia. All participants had an age ranging between 20 and 80 years and had bilateral high myopia, defined as an axial length (AL) of ≥26.5 mm or a refractive error of ≤−6 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent), without secondary causes of myopia, any history of refractive or intraocular surgery, or any systemic conditions. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Beijing Friendship Hospital and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. 
MRI imaging of the orbital region was performed using a 3T MR scanner (Discovery MR750; GE Medical Systems, Chicago, IL, USA) with an eight-channel head coil. The 3D T2-weighted MRI volumes with an in-plane resolution of approximately 0.5 mm and a slice thickness of 1 mm were acquired with parameters of TR = 2500 ms, TE = 248 ms, and flip angle = 90°. Individuals were positioned comfortably in a supine position with their eyes closed and were instructed to minimize eye movements during image acquisition. The MRI image acquisition time for the sequence used in this study averaged 3.38 ± 0.57 minutes. The MRI system includes built-in correction mechanisms for minor motion artifacts. Additionally, a manual review of the MRI image quality was performed. If the scans showed blurry eyeball boundaries, misalignment of tissue structures between slices, or other motion artifacts, the scan was retaken. This process ensured that only high-quality images were included in our analysis. 
Automated Segmentation of the Eyeball Using Deep Learning
A deep learning model was developed to automatically segment the eyeball from the surrounding orbital tissue on the MRI images. To develop the model, we first manually segmented 570 two-dimensional MRI images using 3D Slicer (https://www.slicer.org/) in the sagittal plane to create a ground truth dataset for training and validation. Manual segmentation was primarily performed in the sagittal plane with necessary corrections using information from coronal or axial views of the 3D volume images to ensure accuracy. Once trained, the model was used to delineate the globes from the orbital tissue in all MRI volumes automatically. 
A custom-designed U-shaped convolutional neural network (U-net) was employed, with its architecture detailed in the Supplementary material. The U-net consisted of feature blocks, each comprising a layer normalization, a depth-wise convolution (kernel size of 7 and stride of 1), another layer normalization, and a multilayer perceptron. Skip connections connected the input and output of each feature block. The input was divided into nonoverlapping patches using a convolution (kernel size and stride of 4), followed by three stages of down-sampling and up-sampling. Skip connections concatenated the outputs of different stages. The network utilized the Adam optimizer with a learning rate of 0.001 and a cross-entropy loss function. The Dice coefficient, ranging from 0 to 1, measured the segmentation accuracy, with values above 0.9 indicating excellent overlap between automated and manual segmentations. 
3D Reconstruction and Posterior Scleral Topography
Before the automatic segmentation of the eyeball, the MRI images were resampled in the sagittal direction to achieve a slice spacing of 0.5 mm, resulting in a uniform pixel spacing of 0.5 mm in all three dimensions. After the segmentation, Gaussian smoothing and the marching cubes algorithm were applied to the segmented eyeball to obtain the point cloud of the eyeball surface. A spatial Cartesian coordinate system based on the MRI volume was established for these points: the naso-temporal direction as the X-axis, the antero-posterior as the Y-axis, and the infero-superior direction as the Z-axis. Because eyes were closed during imaging, maintaining a primary gaze position was exactly not possible. Therefore, this initial coordinate system was refined to align the Y-axis with the antero-posterior direction of the eyeball, i.e., the pupillary-foveal axis. This refinement involved identifying a maximally inscribed sphere within the eyeball surface using a search algorithm. The center of this sphere was considered to be on the pupillary-foveal axis. We identified the point on the anterior sphere surface most distant from the sphere center, and considered it to be the corneal vertex. The line connecting the corneal vertex and the sphere center defined the pupillary-foveal axis (Fig. 1A). This method was validated through manual examination of the axes on the MRI images and compared against the method proposed by Hoang et al.22 We found strong agreement between these two methods (see Supplementary Material for details). It is worth noting that instead of directly fitting the entire eyeball surface, we used this inscribed sphere method. It avoided any influence from irregularities of the posterior eye shape in eyes with staphylomas that could have skewed the pupillary axis. The origin of the coordinate system was set 12 mm posterior to the corneal vertex, approximating the center of a normal eyeball and referred to as the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center. The posterior scleral topography was generated in a posterior region spanning 120° (Fig. 1B). For the assessment of the topography, we determined two key parameters: the distance (D) from each point to the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center, and the curvature radius (C) at each point. The distance could reveal a potential eyeball elongation or eyeball bulging if it was greater than 12 mm. The curvature was based on how well a small sphere fitted the local surface points within a radius of 3 mm (Figure 1C). From this topography, the location and extents of posterior scleral protrusion could be viewed, similar to a corneal topography. 
Figure 1.
 
Parameter analysis process of the posterior surface of the eyeball. (A) The eyeball center (yellow dot) and the corneal vertex (blue dot) were obtained from a maximally inscribed sphere within the eyeball surface and the point most distant to this center on the anterior surface, respectively. The line connecting these two points was defined as the pupillary-foveal axis. (B) The origin of the coordinate system was set at 12 mm posterior to the corneal vertex, approximating the center of a normal eyeball with an axial length of about 24 mm. Parameters were measured and the posterior scleral topography was generated for a posterior region spanning 120°. (C) Distance (D) from each point to the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center (green dot) and the curvature (C) based on fitting a small spherical surface to the local points within a 3 mm radius region centered at each point, were measured over a 120° range of the posterior eyeball.
Figure 1.
 
Parameter analysis process of the posterior surface of the eyeball. (A) The eyeball center (yellow dot) and the corneal vertex (blue dot) were obtained from a maximally inscribed sphere within the eyeball surface and the point most distant to this center on the anterior surface, respectively. The line connecting these two points was defined as the pupillary-foveal axis. (B) The origin of the coordinate system was set at 12 mm posterior to the corneal vertex, approximating the center of a normal eyeball with an axial length of about 24 mm. Parameters were measured and the posterior scleral topography was generated for a posterior region spanning 120°. (C) Distance (D) from each point to the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center (green dot) and the curvature (C) based on fitting a small spherical surface to the local points within a 3 mm radius region centered at each point, were measured over a 120° range of the posterior eyeball.
Development of Parameters to Characterize Posterior Scleral Morphology
Using the distance (D) and curvature (C) values, several parameters were developed to characterize the posterior scleral shape as follows: 
  • Dmean: The mean value of D, representing the mean posterior scleral deviation from the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center.
  • Cmean: The mean value of C, representing the mean curvature of the posterior sclera within the 120° range.
  • Dmax: 95th percentile value of D, serving as an approximation for the maximum distance of the posterior sclera offset from the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center. We used the 95th percentile value rather than the true maximum value as a more robust estimate to avoid the potential influence of outlier points.
  • Cmax: 95th percentile value of C as an approximation of the maximum curvature (sharpest bend) of the posterior scleral surface. Again, the 95th percentile value was used for robustness.
  • Dvar: The variance of D, quantifying how far the surface deviated from a standard spherical surface. A spherical shape would have a value of zero and any deviation from a sphere result in a value larger than zero.
  • C · D: The product of C and D at individual points. The mean and maximum values of C · D were also calculated as C · Dmean and C · Dmax using similar approaches as described above. This parameter combined the effects of scleral distance from the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center and the impact of local curvature. A point far from the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center (indicating more marked elongation or bulging) with a larger curvature (sharper protrusion) would be worse as the distance value is amplified by the curvature value.
Qualitative Classification of Staphyloma Types
To assess how well our developed parameters correlated with conventional staphyloma classifications, we manually classified the staphyloma type according to the method described by Guo et al.14 This classification was performed by two experienced graders using 3D MRI and ultrasound images. Three distinct categories of eye shape were defined (Fig. 2): 
  • Type 0: Nasal and temporal symmetry with elongated posterior globe without apparent posterior globe protrusion.
  • Type 1: Nasal and temporal symmetry with elongated posterior and conical protrusion.
  • Type 2: Nasal or temporal protrusion with elongated posterior globe.
Figure 2.
 
Three categories of eye shapes with three different views of the eyeball reconstructed from MRI images. This visualization was based on the segmented eyeball labels and was performed using the Volume Rendering module in the Amira software, using advanced features such as setting lighting to Specular and shade effects to Ambient. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with elongated posterior and conical protrusion. (C) Type 2 with elongated posterior and sharp nasal or temporal protrusion.
Figure 2.
 
Three categories of eye shapes with three different views of the eyeball reconstructed from MRI images. This visualization was based on the segmented eyeball labels and was performed using the Volume Rendering module in the Amira software, using advanced features such as setting lighting to Specular and shade effects to Ambient. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with elongated posterior and conical protrusion. (C) Type 2 with elongated posterior and sharp nasal or temporal protrusion.
Assessing Retinal Complications Associated With Staphyloma and OCT Imaging
Each eye's macular region was imaged with spectral-domain OCT (Spectralis; Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) before and after the MRI scan. Each OCT raster scan comprised 31 horizontal B-scans (each composed of 768 A-scans) covering a rectangular region of 10.0 ± 1.1 mm (width) × 7.5 ± 1.1 mm (height) centered on the macula. The distance between consecutive B-scans varied slightly across eyes and averaged 278.7 ± 27.2 µm. Similarly, the lateral resolution of each B-scan varied slightly across eyes and averaged 13.1 ± 1.3 µm horizontally. The axial resolution was fixed at 3.9 µm. Each B-scan was averaged 20 times during acquisition to reduce speckle noise. 
The correlation of the developed parameters with myopic macula changes was examined using the myopic traction maculopathy (MTM) grades based on the ATN classifications described by Ruiz-Medrano et al.,23 which included atrophic (A), tractional (T), and neovascular (N) changes. MTM is typically classified into six stages: T0, no myopic schisis; T1, inner or outer foveoschisis; T2, inner and outer foveoschisis; T3, foveal detachment; T4, full-thickness macular hole; T5, full-thickness macular hole and retinal detachment. Due to limited data in this study, we categorized them into 3 groups: T0, T1-2 and T3-5. All MTM diagnoses were made and confirmed by macular OCT scans and corresponding fundus images. The correlation between the well-performing parameters and MTM grades was evaluated using Lasso regression to adjust for age and AL. 
Statistical Analysis
We described the parameters by their means ± standard deviations. We used generalized estimating equations to determine the statistical significance of differences between groups, accounting for intereye correlation. P values adjusted by Bonferroni´s correction were considered statistically significant if less than 0.05. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used and to assess the performance of parameters in classifying the various staphyloma types. Additionally, partial AUC at specificity of 85% to 100%24,25 was also calculated. The statistical analysis was performed using a statistical software program (Python 3.11, with packages of Pingouin 0.5, Pandas 2.0, and NumPy 1.25). 
Results
Subjects, MRI Images, and Automatic Segmentation Model
The study included 102 eyes from 52 subjects with a mean age of 60.570 ± 13.399 years and a mean axial length of 28.482 ± 2.355 mm. The three staphyloma type groups differed significantly in axial length (all P < 0.001) (Table 1). 
Table 1.
 
Demographic Characteristics and Morphological Parameters of Various Staphyloma Categories
Table 1.
 
Demographic Characteristics and Morphological Parameters of Various Staphyloma Categories
The automated segmentation model achieved an average Dice coefficient of 0.935 for the eyeballs in the test dataset, with a 95% confidence interval from 0.917 to 0.953, a metric deemed excellent in the realm of medical image segmentation. Comprehensive details regarding the deep learning model's performance are presented in the supplementary material
Posterior Scleral Topography
The automatically generated posterior scleral topography map showed extent and location of scleral bulging and irregularities in the curvature distribution of the staphyloma (Fig 3). 
Figure 3.
 
Posterior scleral topography map with different eye shapes. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Distance (D) and curvature (C) in the center of the posterior surface were significantly higher than the surrounding area and the bulging was already clearly visible. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. D and C were overall significantly higher overall and the bulging was more pronounced on both the temporal and nasal sides.
Figure 3.
 
Posterior scleral topography map with different eye shapes. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Distance (D) and curvature (C) in the center of the posterior surface were significantly higher than the surrounding area and the bulging was already clearly visible. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. D and C were overall significantly higher overall and the bulging was more pronounced on both the temporal and nasal sides.
Distribution of Scleral Morphology Parameters
Table 1 displays the distribution of each developed parameter across the manually classified staphyloma types, with most parameters revealing variations among the different staphyloma types. 
Performance of Morphology Parameters in Conventional Classification of Staphyloma
The parameter that most effectively differentiated between Type 0 and Type 1 staphyloma was C · Dmax, with an AUC value of 0.923 (Table 1). Dvar was the most efficient at distinguishing between Type 1 and Type 2 staphyloma, although Dmax, C · Dmean, and C · Dmax also yielded strong results in this differentiation. Given that separating Type 0 from Type 2 staphyloma was relatively straightforward, numerous morphological parameters, including axial length, demonstrated good performance. For the comprehensive discrimination among the three staphyloma types, C · Dmax exhibited the best overall efficacy, with all AUC values exceeding 0.9 (Fig. 4). 
Figure 4.
 
Different C · Dmax, Dvar, and AL corresponding to three categories of eye shapes. The images in the first panel illustrated curves drawn according to the ideal values of Dvar, spanning a 120° range. In the second panel, the 3D diagram represented the ideal 3D surface shape that corresponded to the assigned parameters. In the third panel, the MRI image depicted the parameters in the sagittal plane of the eyeball respectively. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Dvar and C · Dmax were larger than in (A) because of larger elongation and local protrusion of the posterior eyeball. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. More severe overall elongation and protrusion of the eyeball resulted in a much more Dvar and C Dmax, although the axial length of this eye was similar to (B).
Figure 4.
 
Different C · Dmax, Dvar, and AL corresponding to three categories of eye shapes. The images in the first panel illustrated curves drawn according to the ideal values of Dvar, spanning a 120° range. In the second panel, the 3D diagram represented the ideal 3D surface shape that corresponded to the assigned parameters. In the third panel, the MRI image depicted the parameters in the sagittal plane of the eyeball respectively. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Dvar and C · Dmax were larger than in (A) because of larger elongation and local protrusion of the posterior eyeball. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. More severe overall elongation and protrusion of the eyeball resulted in a much more Dvar and C Dmax, although the axial length of this eye was similar to (B).
Additionally, the best partial AUC values (normalized by dividing by 0.15) achieved for differentiating between Type 0 and Type 1 staphyloma and Type 0 and Type 2 staphyloma were 0.614 (C · Dmax) and 0.872 (Dvar), respectively (Supplementary Fig. S4 and Supplementary Table S2 in the Supplementary Material). Type 1 and Type 2 can be well differentiated by numerous morphological parameters, including axial length and Dvar
Correlation of Morphologic Parameters With Retinal Complications
In our study, a total of 85 eyes from 44 individuals were used for MTM grading. Among these, 38 eyes had no MTM (T0), whereas 47 eyes exhibited MTM lesions. Of the eyes with MTM, 32 had mild to moderate MTM (T1-2) and 15 had severe MTM (T3-5). 
After adjusting for age and axial length, significant correlations were found between Dvar and C · Dmax with the grades of MTM based on the ATN classifications (Table 2). Specifically, the beta coefficients were 0.752 mm2 (P = 0.022) for Dvar and 2.435 (P = 0.016) for C · Dmax (Figure 5). In the context of Lasso regression analysis, the beta coefficient represents the magnitude of change in the MTM grade for a one-unit change in the predictor variable, assuming all other variables remain constant. 
Table 2.
 
Correlation Between Disease Categories of MTM Grades Based on ATN Classifications and Measured Parameters
Table 2.
 
Correlation Between Disease Categories of MTM Grades Based on ATN Classifications and Measured Parameters
Figure 5.
 
Different Dvar and images for three MTM categories based on the ATN classifications. (A) T0 with a low Dvar. No MTM was observed in the retinal layer of the macular area. (B) T1-2 with lightly larger Dvar and retinoschisis. (C) T3-5 with further larger Dvar, retinoschisis, and macular hole.
Figure 5.
 
Different Dvar and images for three MTM categories based on the ATN classifications. (A) T0 with a low Dvar. No MTM was observed in the retinal layer of the macular area. (B) T1-2 with lightly larger Dvar and retinoschisis. (C) T3-5 with further larger Dvar, retinoschisis, and macular hole.
Discussion
This study presents a novel approach for analyzing posterior scleral staphylomas by automatically generating a posterior sclera topography from 3D MRI images. The topography allows for a visualization and quantification of staphyloma location and severity, overcoming the limitations of subjective assessments used in previous studies relying on 3D MRI. Quantitative parameters derived from the topography data, particularly Dvar and C · Dmax, demonstrated a statistically strong agreement with conventional classification methods for staphylomas. Moreover, these two parameters correlated well with the grades of MTM based on ATN classifications, suggesting their potential correlation with the disease progression. 
Although prior research used 3D MRI for analyzing and classifying posterior scleral staphyloma, the studies predominantly depended on subjective evaluations of the ocular shape. Such a methodology is, however, intrinsically subjective, constraining both repeatability and scalability. Conversely, the present study automated the assessment of the posterior scleral topography and introduced parameters to quantify shape, thus rendering the assessment of posterior staphyloma more objective and standardized. 
Among the parameters developed, Dvar and C · Dmax demonstrated significant capabilities in differentiating various types of posterior staphyloma, which were manually classified using conventional subjective methods. Dmax was effective in distinguishing Type 2 from Type 0 and Type 1, yet its performance in differentiating between Type 0 and Type 1 was comparatively weaker. In pairwise comparisons across the three staphyloma types, C · Dmax consistently achieved AUC values greater than 0.9, particularly excelling in distinguishing Type 0 from Type 1. Because of the clear distinction between Type 0 and Type 2, seven parameters, including axial length, yielded good results in the differentiation. Our findings aligned well with the conventional method, highlighting our method's validity. Furthermore, the partial AUCs at a specificity of 85% to 100%, which was reported to be clinically relevant,24,25 were highest for Dvar and C · Dmax, consistent with their overall AUC performance. It is important to recognize, however, that the conventional method is subjective and should not be regarded as the definitive standard. Our research established a foundation for quantifying posterior scleral shape in future studies and clinical assessments. 
The calculations of Dvar and C · Dmax were anchored on comparing the posterior scleral surface to a standard sphere with a radius of 12 mm. Dvar quantified the deviation from this sphere, illustrating the extent of asphericity or distortion. Conversely, C · Dmax encapsulated the scleral distance from the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center, indicative of elongation or bulging, and the local curvature, reflecting distortion. Figure 4 shows the Dvar and C · Dmax values across the three staphyloma types. For an eyeball with an axial length of 24 mm and without posterior staphyloma, Dvar would tend toward 0, whereas C · Dmax would be close to 1. In Figure 4A, the eye exhibited elongation, leading to a C · Dmax > 1, yet the posterior surface remained spherical, keeping Dvar near 1. In the case of a sharper protrusion, as seen in Figure 4B, Dvar was comparatively higher. Figure 4C depicted an eye that was more elongated with a rougher posterior scleral surface, resulting in elevated values for both Dvar and C·Dmax. Integrating these parameters with the generated topography offered a detailed and intuitive evaluation of the posterior scleral shape and staphyloma severity. 
The clinical relevance of our approach was underscored by the established link between the posterior staphyloma shape and various characteristics of myopic macular degeneration.20,23,26,27 It was shown by the correlation between Dvar and C·Dmax and the grades of MTM based on ATN classifications. 
The topography and parameters we developed were based on 3D MRI images. Currently, 3D MRI is not routinely performed in clinical ophthalmology. However, these parameters can be adapted for OCT images. Traditional OCT imaging has a limited field of view, restricting the assessment to a relatively small posterior region. It may potentially lead to missing posterior scleral staphylomas. However, with advancements in OCT technology, commercial ultra-widefield OCT systems have become increasingly available, supporting extensive scan ranges of up to 23 mm in width with a depth exceeding 20 mm.2831 These capabilities enable the capture and segmentation of the posterior scleral shape, with deep learning techniques aiding in this process. It is crucial to acknowledge that OCT imaging may be influenced by optical distortions. Although advanced OCT systems include software algorithms to correct for recognized sources of optical distortion, the precision of these corrections in ultrawide field OCT, particularly for aspherically-shaped eyes with staphyloma, necessitates additional validation. Future research will involve comparing measurements from MRI and wide-field OCT in eyes of different shapes to ascertain the concordance between these two modalities and to validate the applicability of the parameters, found in the present study, with OCT images. 
In conclusion, this study established a novel and objective method for quantifying posterior scleral staphylomas using 3D MRI-derived topography and associated parameters. These parameters demonstrated a strong agreement with conventional classification methods and offer potential for improved assessment of staphyloma severity. Future research focusing on adapting these parameters to wide-field OCT imaging may facilitate broader clinical application and enhance understanding of the relationship between posterior staphyloma and associated retinal pathologies. 
Acknowledgments
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101128, 12272030), the Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Program (QML20230109), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFC2410404) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Z240017). 
Disclosure: Y.X. Han, None; X.X. Guo, None; Y.X. Wang, None; J.B. Jonas, None; X. Chen, None; X.F. Wang, None 
References
Shinohara K, Shimada N, Moriyama M, et al. Posterior staphylomas in pathologic myopia imaged by widefield optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017; 58: 3750. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohno-Matsui K. Proposed classification of posterior staphylomas based on analyses of eye shape by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and wide-field fundus imaging. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121: 1798–1809. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ehongo A. Understanding posterior staphyloma in pathologic myopia: current overview, new input, and perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17: 3825–3853. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohno-Matsui K, Lai TYY, Lai CC, Cheung CMG. Updates of pathologic myopia. Prog Retinal Eye Res. 2016; 52: 156–187. [CrossRef]
Ruiz-Moreno JM, Puertas M, Flores-Moreno I, Almazán-Alonso E, García-Zamora M, Ruiz-Medrano J. Posterior staphyloma as determining factor for myopic maculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023; 252: 9–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohno-Matsui K, Jonas JB. Posterior staphyloma in pathologic myopia. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019; 70: 99–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zheng F, Wong CW, Sabanayagam C, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and impact of posterior staphyloma diagnosed from wide-field optical coherence tomography in Singapore adults with high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021; 99: e144–e153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Igarashi-Yokoi T, Shinohara K, Fang Y, et al. Prognostic factors for axial length elongation and posterior staphyloma in adults with high myopia: a Japanese observational study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021; 225: 76–85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Steidl SM, Pruett RC. Macular complications associated with posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997; 123: 181–187. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Frisina R, Baldi A, Cesana BM, Semeraro F, Parolini B. Morphological and clinical characteristics of myopic posterior staphyloma in Caucasians. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 254: 2119–2129. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Flores-Moreno I, Puertas M, Ruiz-Medrano J, Almazán-Alonso E, García-Zamora M, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Influence of posterior staphyloma in myopic maculopathy and visual prognosis. Eye. 2024; 38: 145–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ripandelli G, Rossi T, Scarinci F, Scassa C, Parisi V, Stirpe M. Macular vitreoretinal interface abnormalities in highly myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma: 5-year follow-up. Retina. 2012; 32: 1531. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Curtin BJ. The posterior staphyloma of pathologic myopia. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1977; 75: 67–86. [PubMed]
Guo X, Xiao O, Chen Y, et al. Three-dimensional eye shape, myopic maculopathy, and visual acuity: the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center–Brien Holden Vision Institute High Myopia Cohort Study. Ophthalmology. 2017; 124: 679–687. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
An G, Dai F, Wang R, et al. Association between the types of posterior staphyloma and their risk factors in pathological myopia. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2021; 10: 5. [CrossRef]
Luo N, Wang Y, Alimu S, et al. Assessment of ocular deformation in pathologic myopia using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023; 141: 768. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cheng HM, Singh OS, Kwong KK, Xiong J, Woods BT, Brady TJ. Shape of the myopic eye as seen with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Optom Vis Sci. 1992; 69: 698. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Singh KD, Logan NS, Gilmartin B. Three-dimensional modeling of the human eye based on magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47: 2272. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Moriyama M, Ohno-Matsui K, Hayashi K, et al. Topographic analyses of shape of eyes with pathologic myopia by high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118: 1626–1637. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ohno-Matsui K, Akiba M, Modegi T, et al. Association between shape of sclera and myopic retinochoroidal lesions in patients with pathologic myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 6046. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rong H, Liu L, Liu Y, et al. Quantifying the morphology of eyeballs with posterior staphyloma with Zernike polynomials. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11: 1126543. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hoang QV, Chang S, Yu DJG, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB, Grinband J. 3-D assessment of gaze-induced eye shape deformations and downgaze-induced vitreous chamber volume increase in highly myopic eyes with staphyloma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021; 105: 1149–1154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ruiz-Medrano J, Montero JA, Flores-Moreno I, Arias L, García-Layana A, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Myopic maculopathy: current status and proposal for a new classification and grading system (ATN). Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019; 69: 80–115. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zhu H, Crabb DP, Ho T, Garway-Heath DF. More accurate modeling of visual field progression in glaucoma: ANSWERS. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56: 6077. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jammal AA, Thompson AC, Mariottoni EB, et al. Human versus machine: comparing a deep learning algorithm to human gradings for detecting glaucoma on fundus photographs. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020; 211: 123–131. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Minami S, Ito Y, Ueno S, et al. Analysis of macular curvature in normal eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020; 64: 180–186. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Komori S, Ueno S, Ito Y, et al. Steeper macular curvature in eyes with non-highly myopic retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019; 60: 3135. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
He G, Zhang X, Zhuang X, et al. A novel exploration of the choroidal vortex vein system: incidence and characteristics of posterior vortex veins in healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65: 21. [CrossRef]
Zhao X-Y, Zhao Q, Wang C-T, et al. Central and peripheral changes in retinal vein occlusion and fellow eyes in ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65: 6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nissen AHK, Vergmann AS. Clinical utilisation of wide-field optical coherence tomography and angiography: a narrative review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13: 903–915. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ishikura M, Muraoka Y, Nishigori N, et al. Widefield choroidal thickness of eyes with central serous chorioretinopathy examined by swept-source OCT. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022; 6: 949–956. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
 
Parameter analysis process of the posterior surface of the eyeball. (A) The eyeball center (yellow dot) and the corneal vertex (blue dot) were obtained from a maximally inscribed sphere within the eyeball surface and the point most distant to this center on the anterior surface, respectively. The line connecting these two points was defined as the pupillary-foveal axis. (B) The origin of the coordinate system was set at 12 mm posterior to the corneal vertex, approximating the center of a normal eyeball with an axial length of about 24 mm. Parameters were measured and the posterior scleral topography was generated for a posterior region spanning 120°. (C) Distance (D) from each point to the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center (green dot) and the curvature (C) based on fitting a small spherical surface to the local points within a 3 mm radius region centered at each point, were measured over a 120° range of the posterior eyeball.
Figure 1.
 
Parameter analysis process of the posterior surface of the eyeball. (A) The eyeball center (yellow dot) and the corneal vertex (blue dot) were obtained from a maximally inscribed sphere within the eyeball surface and the point most distant to this center on the anterior surface, respectively. The line connecting these two points was defined as the pupillary-foveal axis. (B) The origin of the coordinate system was set at 12 mm posterior to the corneal vertex, approximating the center of a normal eyeball with an axial length of about 24 mm. Parameters were measured and the posterior scleral topography was generated for a posterior region spanning 120°. (C) Distance (D) from each point to the hypothetical pre-elongation eye center (green dot) and the curvature (C) based on fitting a small spherical surface to the local points within a 3 mm radius region centered at each point, were measured over a 120° range of the posterior eyeball.
Figure 2.
 
Three categories of eye shapes with three different views of the eyeball reconstructed from MRI images. This visualization was based on the segmented eyeball labels and was performed using the Volume Rendering module in the Amira software, using advanced features such as setting lighting to Specular and shade effects to Ambient. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with elongated posterior and conical protrusion. (C) Type 2 with elongated posterior and sharp nasal or temporal protrusion.
Figure 2.
 
Three categories of eye shapes with three different views of the eyeball reconstructed from MRI images. This visualization was based on the segmented eyeball labels and was performed using the Volume Rendering module in the Amira software, using advanced features such as setting lighting to Specular and shade effects to Ambient. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with elongated posterior and conical protrusion. (C) Type 2 with elongated posterior and sharp nasal or temporal protrusion.
Figure 3.
 
Posterior scleral topography map with different eye shapes. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Distance (D) and curvature (C) in the center of the posterior surface were significantly higher than the surrounding area and the bulging was already clearly visible. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. D and C were overall significantly higher overall and the bulging was more pronounced on both the temporal and nasal sides.
Figure 3.
 
Posterior scleral topography map with different eye shapes. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Distance (D) and curvature (C) in the center of the posterior surface were significantly higher than the surrounding area and the bulging was already clearly visible. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. D and C were overall significantly higher overall and the bulging was more pronounced on both the temporal and nasal sides.
Figure 4.
 
Different C · Dmax, Dvar, and AL corresponding to three categories of eye shapes. The images in the first panel illustrated curves drawn according to the ideal values of Dvar, spanning a 120° range. In the second panel, the 3D diagram represented the ideal 3D surface shape that corresponded to the assigned parameters. In the third panel, the MRI image depicted the parameters in the sagittal plane of the eyeball respectively. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Dvar and C · Dmax were larger than in (A) because of larger elongation and local protrusion of the posterior eyeball. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. More severe overall elongation and protrusion of the eyeball resulted in a much more Dvar and C Dmax, although the axial length of this eye was similar to (B).
Figure 4.
 
Different C · Dmax, Dvar, and AL corresponding to three categories of eye shapes. The images in the first panel illustrated curves drawn according to the ideal values of Dvar, spanning a 120° range. In the second panel, the 3D diagram represented the ideal 3D surface shape that corresponded to the assigned parameters. In the third panel, the MRI image depicted the parameters in the sagittal plane of the eyeball respectively. (A) Type 0 without apparent posterior globe protrusion. (B) Type 1 with protrusion of the center section. Dvar and C · Dmax were larger than in (A) because of larger elongation and local protrusion of the posterior eyeball. (C) Type 2 with a much larger protrusion. More severe overall elongation and protrusion of the eyeball resulted in a much more Dvar and C Dmax, although the axial length of this eye was similar to (B).
Figure 5.
 
Different Dvar and images for three MTM categories based on the ATN classifications. (A) T0 with a low Dvar. No MTM was observed in the retinal layer of the macular area. (B) T1-2 with lightly larger Dvar and retinoschisis. (C) T3-5 with further larger Dvar, retinoschisis, and macular hole.
Figure 5.
 
Different Dvar and images for three MTM categories based on the ATN classifications. (A) T0 with a low Dvar. No MTM was observed in the retinal layer of the macular area. (B) T1-2 with lightly larger Dvar and retinoschisis. (C) T3-5 with further larger Dvar, retinoschisis, and macular hole.
Table 1.
 
Demographic Characteristics and Morphological Parameters of Various Staphyloma Categories
Table 1.
 
Demographic Characteristics and Morphological Parameters of Various Staphyloma Categories
Table 2.
 
Correlation Between Disease Categories of MTM Grades Based on ATN Classifications and Measured Parameters
Table 2.
 
Correlation Between Disease Categories of MTM Grades Based on ATN Classifications and Measured Parameters
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×